Man Laws » Monthly Man Laws

Why Do You Think Men Cheat On Beautiful Women With Ugly Women?

manlaws — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:41:06 +0000

I mean honestly, Jude Law cheated on Sienna Miller with that pitbull faced nanny. I don’t get it.

Who Agrees That Evolution Is Just A Theory?

manlaws — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:37:27 +0000

We did not come from monkeys. My degree was science/chemistry. Some scientist believe this junk theology…but many do not! It’s a theory….in other words…an idea which has never been proven or disproven…therefore it remains a theory.
Now a few examples of why I do not believe this theory:
Any animal that has evolved does not remain….yet the monkey is still with us…the average day monkey has not evolved into a man!
I believe many animals have adapted to their environment and thus their features change to meet their surrounding needs…thus adaptation! However, to evolve into something totally more advance such as monkey into man would mean that the monkey would no longer exist because man would take his place…why does the monkey still exist????
The same can be said for apes and all other animals someone could possibly say man evolved from! Why do they all still exist today?
Charles Darwin was a very smart man. His adaptation theory is quite genius and his studies were revolutionary and also opened the eyes of the scientific community…however his evolution theory lacks common sense from such a pioneer!
Even if you disagree with the above…how do you explain how any life began on earth? Life cannot just spring up…and Mathematically, it is inconceivable that anything as complex as a protein, let alone a living cell or a human, could spring up by chance.
Consider the following:
Nobody has ever seen a new species evolve.
Evolutionists cannot point to any transitional fossils–creatures that are half reptile and half bird, for instance. Where are all the transitional species. Really there should be a continuous line of transitional species, in the order of 1000’s of times more numerous than obviously distinct species, and yet we have a clumps of very distinct species. And no transitional forms….
Recent discoveries prove that even at the microscopic level, life has a quality of complexity that could not have come about through evolution.
Evolution is only a theory. It is not a fact or a scientific law.
1st law of thermodynamics states the energy(in this case life) cannot be created or destroyed! In other words life cannot just form…some form of energy must have been present! This is not a theory, it’s a law.
Law of biogenesis. People once believed that maggots were spontaneously generated from the flesh of dead animals. They thought life could come from non-life. Louis Pasteur proved beyond doubt that life cannot arise from non-life. This is not a scientific theory, but a law. Proponents of evolution contend that life did arise spontaneously from non-life at least once in the past, in other words, that this particular natural law was broken or nonexistent sometime in the past. Again this cannot happen as energy cannot be created or destroyed!!!
Darwin himself wrote:If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.
Darwin wrote:To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.
The ability to fly supposedly evolved spontaneously by chance at least four times: for insects, birds, mammals (bats) and reptiles. Yet intelligent man did not figure out the principles of flight until the past century.
Many of what Darwin considered to be transitional species have been discredited. Even Archaeopteryx, once thought to be transitional between reptiles and birds, is not. Modern birds have been found deeper in the fossil record. For the most part nature’s divisions are not blurred and indistinct, currently or in the fossil record. The phyla appear in the fossil record almost instantaneously in what is known as the Cambrian explosion, with no apparent connections.
Evolution teaches that fish evolved from lower animals. How did they get fins? No evolutionist claims that fins came in one generation, but rather in many generations. In other words, the development of fins was a GRADUAL development. And from where did birds get their wings? No evolutionist claims that wings came in one generation, but rather in many generations. They claim that the development of wings was through a very slow, gradual process. Now when the process, let us say, was half way complete, the “fin” or the “wing,” as the case may be, would be useless — good for nothing — for a fish cannot swim with a part-fin nor can a bird fly with a part-wing! A part-fin or a part-wing, would be a monstrosity, not a perfect adaptation such as we see everywhere in nature. NOWHERE IN THE WORLD TODAY CAN ONE FIND PARTLY DEVELOPED APPENDAGES OR ORGANS, but, rather, everywhere there is perfect adaptation, perfect development for its intended purpose. That fact proves that EACH CREATURE, IN ALL ESSENTIAL FEATURES, HAS BEEN EXACTLY AS IT IS NOW, and was so created in the beginning.
Hugo de Vries aptly said, “Natural selection may explain the survival of the fittest, but it cannot explain the arrival of the fittest.”
Science has proven that chaos does not naturally and normally turn into order. Life can only come from life (law of biogenesis). Things dont improve naturally as a matter of course (entropy). Things improve because of intelligent input. For example, the technology we enjoy in the present age is a result of human intelligence, not random chance. Science has given us a great deal, but not everything that exists can be explained scientifically.
Prof. Fleischman, modern zoologist of Erlangen after repudiating Darwinism, said, “The Darwinian theory of descent has not a single fact to confirm it in the realm of nature. It is not the result of scientific research, but purely the product of imagination.”
Dr. Clark (recognized as one of the world’s greatest biologists) was biologist of the United States National Museum, he stated bluntly that Darwin, Lamarck and all their followers were wrong “on almost all vital points.” “So far as concerns the major groups of animals, the creationists seem to have the better of the argument. There is not the slightest evidence that any of the major groups, arose from any other. Each is a special animal-complex. . . .Appearing as a distinct creation.”
Prof. T. H. Morgan said, “Within the period of human history we do not know of a single instance of the transformation of one species into another.” (p. 43. “Evolution and Adaptation;” McMillan, 1903).
Another thought: If there is not supreme being that created heaven and earth and all creatures, then explain how the Earth and world is so organized and designed for life? How did our planet adapt to us???? If the oxygen mixture were more than it is we would die…proof of this is hospitals in earlier years were giving a little too much to preemie babies….they died! In the rest of the universe both WATER and OXYGEN are very scarce; in fact, hydrogen and helium make up 99% of all matter in the universe, yet our earth is designed for life…unexplained or superior design????
There are scores of other “laws” in the universe that are perfect and necessary to make up this vast universe. All students of astronomy are familiar with Kepler’s three laws of planetary motion. There are “laws” of motion, laws of heat, laws of light, laws of sound — and all are PERFECT, never-changing, never-failing. Rear Admiral D. V. Gallery (USN; writing in the Saturday Evening Post), said, “The stars. . . .in their orbits and velocities through the heavens faithfully obey a great code of LAW. Earth’s scientists can quote and explain this code in great detail, until you ask, “Where came these laws?”
Edwin B. Frost, at one time astronomer with the Yerkes Observatory, wrote: “Everything that we learn from the observational point of view in the study of astronomy seems to me to point precisely and always toward a purposeful operation in nature. . . . “I cannot imagine planets getting together and deciding under what law they should operate. NOR DO WE FIND ANYWHERE IN THE SOLAR OR STELLAR SYSTEM THE DEBRIS THAT WOULD NECESSARILY ACCUMULATE IF THE UNIVERSE HAD BEEN OPERATING AT RANDOM. . . .
Proof that the Universe had a Beginning “to assume that the universe had no beginning . . . fails to account for the CONTINUED EXISTENCE OF RADIOACTIVITY.” (Scientific American).
Animals breathe oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide; green plants (in sunlight) take in carbon dioxide and give off oxygen. Without plants in the world the time would soon come when all animals and all men would use up the available oxygen in the air and would perish.” * Who designed such a complex system??? * “Give the plants a free hand and the water would in time become so alkaline as to destroy them. Give the animals a free hand and they, in the end, would be killed by the acidity they themselves produced; but the two working against one another insure the maintenance of conditions vital to both. All life is like that: a thousand interacting and balanced forces, like the flying buttresses of a towering Gothic Cathedral; destroy one and the whole graceful fabric comes down in irreparable ruin.” (Creation’s Amazing Architect).
Flowers supply bees with nectar; bees in turn transfer pollen from one flower to another, thus preserving the life of the species. HMMMM??? These species formed a treaty all on their own?????? Is this their own plan or of a superior design?
IF THE RELATIVE HUMIDITY AND THE AVERAGE TEMPERATURE WERE INCREASED, THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT WOULD SOON BE RUINED BY MOLDS! Who keeps these in check???? By chance they sustain??? Not probable!!!
The atmosphere gives us a protective covering from the harmful effects of the ultra-violet rays from the sun. Dr. Florence E. Miller, scientist connected with the Smithsonian Institute, says that we live “miraculously” on this planet, protected from eight “killer rays” from the sun, by a thin layer of ozone high up in our atmosphere. “If that little belt of ozone, approximately forty miles up and only one-eighth of an inch thick (if compressed), should suddenly drift into space, all life on earth would perish.” The whole subject of “ozone” in the air is so unusual, it seems almost incredible. “There are two kinds of ultra-violet rays — long and short. The long are deadly, and are absorbed and neutralized by that ozone belt. If permitted to come through, they would blnd and blister the human race, and would soon destroy all life on earth. The short violet rays, on the other hand, are necessary to life. If that belt of protective ozone were too thick, so that the short rays could not come through, we would all die of rickets. “the most deadly of the ‘eight killers’ comes through in quantities just sufficient to render great service, without destroying us. It keeps down the growth of green algae, one-celled plants that grow in streams. Unrestricted, they would multiply so rapidly that they would clog all the streams of the world, and lead to endless flooding of the world. On the other hand, it is fortunate for the earth as we know it that the algae were allowed to develop in moderation.”
The earth is just THE RIGHT DISTANCE from the sun, relative to the amount of heat and light the sun pours into space. If the earth were much closer, it would be too hot; If it were much farther away, it would be too cold. Dr. William J. Humphreys, formerly with the United States weather bureau told the American Meteorological Society that if the average temperature of the earth were raised but two or three degrees “you could bid goodbye to all the big cities of the earth,”
Blind evolution is helpless to produce such endless intricacies of design and adaptation. Why – how -could chance evolution, by “random changes,” produce an intricate, living, workable mechanism like the examples described above?
Our world was designed for us to live in…everything designed for a reason. The food chain for example is a complex design of energy passed on…who designed such a plan???
reproduction of new life is complex! Who designed such this plan?
All things organic and non organic were designed and have specific function in the universe! These did not randomly decide to do their part…it was a superior design created by a higher being!

Share This

I’m Not Being A Feminist, But….?

manlaws — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:38:42 +0000

When we refer to a couple, why do we always mention the man’s name before the woman’s?
For example:
Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie
Jude Law and Sienna Miller
Paul McCartney and Heather Mills, etc.
What do you think?
It also works with non celebrities, I just thought it would be boring.

Share This

Is Anyone Really Surprised By This?

manlaws — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:36:56 +0000

Sienna Miller has dumped Balthazar Getty after he left his wife & kids for her!!! She’s got fed up & bored now that he’s finally a free man, like she did with Jude Law and others. Why does she always have to go for taken men? I really hate her!!! And she’s a terrible actress who can’t act to save her life!!!!! What does everyone else think? Thanks, Lisa Michelle x x lol x x

Share This

Celebs With Breast Implants?

manlaws — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:44:55 +0000

Have you noticed famous women with breast implants always end up single or have average-intellectual boyfriends? I don’t know if it’s really about implants of course. But if you check, most beautiful women lists full with average sized boobs women. It looks like men in Hollywood love natural women who have small/average boobs:
e.g.
Orlando Bloom & Kate Bosworth, then Miranda Kerr
Johnny Depp & Vanessa Paradis (and Kate Moss)
Jude Law & Sienna Miller
Ben Affleck & Jennifer Garner (and Gwyneth Paltrow)
Brad Pitt & Gwyneth Paltrow
Charlize Theron, Jessica Alba.. list goes on and on.
What do you think?

Share This

Which American T .v. Shows Were These?

manlaws — Sun, 27 Sep 2009 19:37:27 +0000

1. A rough town. One man keeps the law. One bar owner loves the man who keeps the law. ( Sunshine ADORES the man who keeps the law.)
2. A quiet, sleepy little town. The deputy usually locks himself in the cell. The sheriff is constantly bailing him out. The sheriff’s son grew up to be a very important movie director.
3. A young couple live in an apartment house with funny landlords. The lady landlord loves the female tenant, like a sister. The leader of the Cuban band just plain loves her.
4. A doctor is married to a lawyer. They have 5 kids. The doctor is very funny.He seems to have more time for his family than he does for his patients. Now THAT is funny.
5. This family lives in a small house. The father is righteous. He and the Mrs. have more kids each season. The Pa used to be one of the boys on the Ponderosa.
6. They liked the way Glenn Miller played. And they liked the songs that made the Hit Parade. Boy, guys like that ,they had it made. Those were the days.

Share This

Which Song Is Better (rock Quiz #2)?

manlaws — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:43:29 +0000

Rock & Roll Band (OR) Peace Of Mind (Boston)
Light My Fire (OR) Break On Through (The Other Side) (The Doors)
Everlong (OR) Monkey Wrench (Foo Fighters)
Welcome To The Jungle (OR) Sweet Child O’ Mine (Guns N’ Roses)
Painkiller (OR) Breaking The Law (Judas Priest)
Good Mourning/Black Friday (OR) Wake Up Dead (Megadeth)
One (OR) … And Justice For All (Metallica)
Even Flow (OR) Alive (Pearl Jam)
I Could Have Lied (OR) Hump De Bump (Red Hot Chili Peppers)
Limelight (OR) Workin’ Them Angels (Rush)
Fine Again (OR) Fade Away (Seether)
Raining Blood (OR) Angel Of Death (Slayer)
Today (OR) Cherub Rock (Smashing Pumpkins)
Dance, Dance, Dance (OR) The Joker (Steve Miller Band)
Half The Man I Used To Be (OR) Vasoline (Stone Temple Pilots)
Renegade (OR) Mr. Roboto (Styx)
Dog Eat Dog (OR) Stranglehold (Ted Nugent)
Panama (OR) Humans Beings (Van Halen)
Wont Get Fooled Again (OR) Who Are You (The Who)
Loco (OR) Beatiful Disaster (311)
The Kill (OR) Attack (30 Seconds To Mars)
Crazy Train (OR) I Dont Wanna Stop (Ozzy Osbourne)
Sliver (OR) On A Plain (Nirvana)
Have Fun! ;D

Share This

Who Is The Sexiest Man From This List? Cast Your Vote Asap!?

manlaws — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:36:51 +0000

CHOOSE (1) Only. I Know This Is A VERY HARD Question For Ya Ladies…
1) Brad Pitt
2) Colin Farrell
3) Paul Walker
4) Jake Gyllenhaal
5) David Beckham
6) Jared Leto
7) Jude Law
Chris Pine
9) Johhny Depp
10) Heath Ledger
11) Josh Hartnett
12) Jesse Metcalfe
13) Justin Timberlake
14) Matthew McConaughey
15) Orlando Bloom
16) Ryan Phillippe
17) Matt Damon
18) Ben Affleck
19) Michael Owen
20) Tom Cruise
21) Andy Roddick
22) Matthew Davis
23) Landon Donovan
24) Cristiano Ronaldo
25) George Clooney
26) Adam Brody
27) John Stamos
28) Ricky Martin
29) Nick Lachey
30) Matt Leinart
31) Enrique Iglesia
32) Adrian Grenier
33) Andrew Springer
34) Ashton Kutcher
35) Benjamin Bratt
36) James Franco
37) Vin Diesel
38) Ryan Seacrest
39) Christian Bale
40) Usher
41) Antonio Banderas
42) Kevin Bacon
43) Brendan Fraser
44) Ethan Hawke
45) Matt Leblanc
46) Matthew Perry
47) Elijah Wood
48) Wentworth Miller
49) 50 Cent
50) Not Listed (Please Name)

Share This

On Reading The Play “the Crucible” If The Author Miller Agrees With The Following Quotes And Why Or Why Not?

manlaws — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:37:56 +0000

explain the implications and if he agrees or not. please and thankyou =)
1. on religious authority
Parris: theres is either obedience or the church will burn like hell is burning.
2. on legal responsibility
Herrick (who has come to arrest Elizabeth): i have nine men outside. you cannot keep her. the law binds me, john. i cannot budge.
3. on right and wrong
Danforth: but you must understand, sir, that a person is either with tihs court or he must be counted against it, there be no road between.
4. on the courage of one’s convictions
Proctor, laughs insanely, then: a fire, a fire is burning! i hear the boot of Lucifer, I see his filthy face! And it is my face, and ours, Danforth! For them that quail to bring men out of ignorance, as i have quailed and as you quail now when you know in all your black hearts that this be fraud–God damns our kind especially, and we will burn, we will burn together.
5. on the value of life
Hale: life, woman, life is God’s most precious gift; no principle, however glorious, may justify the taking of it. I beg you, woman, prevail upon your husband to confess. Let him give his lie. Quail not before God’s judgement in this, for it may be God damns a liar than he that throws his life away for pride…
Elizabeth, quietly: i think that be the Devil’s argument.
6.On marriage
Elizabeth: i have sins of my own to count. It needs a cold wife to prompt lechery.

Share This

Can Anyone Answer These Questions On The United States Constitution?

manlaws — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:38:21 +0000

1. When you buy a U.S. government savings bond, you’re doing so under the power given to Congress to
A. regulate commerce.
B. levy taxes.
C. print and coin money.
D. borrow money.
2. Suppose you’re an attorney. In a case you’re presenting to a federal court, you argue that the person you’re defending suffered cruel and unusual punishment. Which Amendment of the Constitution should you cite?
A. Amendment III
B. Amendment IV
C. Amendment VIII
D. Amendment IX
3. Which one of the following statements is accurate for the Articles of Confederation?
A. There was no president.
B. There was only one central court.
C. Interstate commerce could be regulated.
D. Each state could veto a presidential decision.
4. The process by which the Constitution was approved by the states is known as
A. vetoing.
B. levying.
C. ratification.
D. impeachment.
5. The governmental body responsible for interpreting the Constitution is the
A. Supreme Court.
B. Senate.
C. House of Representatives.
D. president.
6. Suppose a bill has passed both the House and the Senate. It goes to the president at the beginning of the annual session of Congress. The president doesn’t sign the bill but holds it for more than 10 days. What happens to the bill?
A. It becomes law.
B. It has been vetoed.
C. It cannot become law, but it has not been vetoed.
D. It becomes law only if two-thirds of the House and Senate vote for it.
7. The original purpose of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 was to
A. elect the first president of the United States.
B. revise the Articles of Confederation.
C. solve the slavery issue.
D. develop the principle of states’ rights.
8. The purpose of the Constitution is presented in the
A. Articles.
B. Amendments.
C. Bill of Rights.
D. Preamble.
9. What Supreme Court case established the principle of judicial review?
A. Marbury v. Madison
B. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka Kansas
C. Plessy v. Ferguson
D. Heart of Atlanta Hotel v. United States
10. An agreement to count slaves as three-fifths of a person was related to
A. the way in which population would be counted in each state.
B. the denial of African Americans the right to vote.
C. the number of Senators each state would have.
D. the creation of an upper and a lower house in Congress.
11. Suppose that a woman named Harriet Miller comes before the judge in a pretrial hearing. She’s charged with stealing thousands of dollars from her employer. She pleads guilty. What are Harriet’s rights under the Sixth Amendment?
A. Harriet won’t stand trial but will be sentenced by the judge.
B. Harriet is guaranteed to a speedy trial.
C. Harriet’s case must go before a grand jury.
D. Harriet doesn’t have to be informed of the charge brought against her.
12. The man who served as president of the Constitutional Convention was
A. Alexander Hamilton.
B. Thomas Jefferson.
C. James Madison.
D. George Washington.
13. In 1786, Virginians called a convention in Annapolis to discuss problems with the
A. Articles of Confederation.
B. Declaration of Independence.
C. Constitution.
D. Bill of Rights.
14. You feel every citizen has the right to own a gun. If you argue for that right based on the Constitution, you’re most likely to refer to
A. Amendment I.
B. Amendment II.
C. Amendment IV.
D. Amendment VI.
15. The New Jersey plan called for
A. a strong president.
B. abandoning the Articles of Confederation.
C. the abolition of slavery.
D. equal representation for all states in the Congress.
16. Controls given to one branch of government to limit the power of another branch are known as
A. popular sovereignty.
B. appellate jurisdiction.
C. checks and balances.
D. basic rights.
17. What was the main purpose of the Thirteenth Amendment?
A. It guaranteed the right to vote regardless of race.
B. It gave women the right to vote.
C. It overturned the Three-Fifths Compromise.
D. It abolished slavery.
18. Suppose Briscoe Cole is found not guilty of murder in a fair jury trial. Later, evidence comes to light that Briscoe may have been guilty. Under the _______ principle of the Fifth Amendment, Briscoe can’t be tried again for that same crime.
A. impeachment
B. grand jury
C. due process
D. double jeopardy
19. John Quincy has been a citizen of the United States for 8 years. He is 27 years old. If John decides to run for Congress, what are his options?
A. He can run for the Senate, but not the House.
B. He can’t run for the House or the Senate for at least one more year.
C. He can run for the House, but not the Senate.
D. He won’t ever be qualified to run for the Senate.
20. Senator Dodd of Illinois was elected in 1998. If he decides to run again when his term expires, in what year will the election occur?
A. 2002
B. 2004
C. 2005
D. 2006

Share This